The Capital Works Expenditure is a tax adjustment.
From the Period Compliance screen, you should see a Tax Adjustments Button.
Suppose you have populated the Depreciation Schedule correctly. In that case, you should see the Capital Works Expenditure flow through as a tax adjustment (if you had a pension policy in place it would also split between D1 and D2 .)
This will populate on your tax return section C when you create entries to 30/06.
but why isn’t it also a depreciation schedule item when you have multiple depreciable assets and a capital works deduction? - as is said in the article
You are able to post depreciation prior to getting the actuarial certificate. It is recommended to have the certificate first and then post the depreciation, however as long as the Create Entries process is reversed and then completed again after receiving the Actuary, then it is fine to post the depreciation prior to receiving the Certificate as this will update the split between D1 and D2.
I say this needs to be made clear in the notes / help articles on the depreciation schedule establishment and maintenance
Needs to be made very clear because at the moment it is not clear
This goes in the face of normal processing and understanding, which is to process all transactions first then obtain an actuarial certificate
This would include depreciation to be posted before obtaining a certificate, then create entries
I suggest you add clarity
“We recommend you to have the certificate first and then post the depreciation
If you do not so this, that is, you post depreciation before creating entries, ensure the Create Entries process is reversed and then completed again after receiving the Actuary certificate”
You must make this clear
I also suggest you look at the depreciation schedule when it includes items subject to building allowance
These items are included in ‘calculated depreciation’ and ‘posted depreciation’ – yet the figure in the operating statement excludes building allowance (which is fine)
I suggest the depreciation schedule moves capital works items to the end, and has a separate total for ‘calculated depreciation’ and ‘posted depreciation’ that adds through, and also agrees to the depreciation expense in the gl
Further, the cap works amount will agree to the tax rec and annual return
Yes depreciation is an Achilles heel of SF360. It was also Simple Fund Desktop’s Achilles heel too that received no development to make it ‘better’ in all the years I was using it for (since at least 2006).
Don’t hold your breath, depreciation has always felt like an after thought with BGL.